Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism. - Université Jean-Monnet-Saint-Étienne Access content directly
Journal Articles New England Journal of Medicine Year : 2009

Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

Sam Schulman
  • Function : Author
Clive Kearon
  • Function : Author
Ajay K Kakkar
  • Function : Author
Sebastian Schellong
  • Function : Author
Henry Eriksson
  • Function : Author
David Baanstra
  • Function : Author
Janet Schnee
Samuel Z Goldhaber
  • Function : Author
Non Renseigné
  • Function : Author


BACKGROUND: The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests. RESULTS: A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P<0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.) Copyright 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society.



Dates and versions

ujm-00439704 , version 1 (08-12-2009)



Sam Schulman, Clive Kearon, Ajay K Kakkar, Patrick Mismetti, Sebastian Schellong, et al.. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009, epub ahead of print. ⟨10.1056/NEJMoa0906598⟩. ⟨ujm-00439704⟩
58 View
0 Download



Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More